TY - JOUR
T1 - Data Is Not Neutral: A Conceptual Framework for Value-Laden Measurement Choices in Materials Informatics
AU - Sanjay Kulkarni
AU - Meenal Joshi
AU - Rohan Patil
JF - Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Materials Science
JO - J. Artif. Intell. Mater. Sci.
SN - 3149-8957
Y1 - 2025
VL - 4
IS - 2
SP - 84
N2 - Materials informatics has become a central paradigm in materials science, leveraging machine learning and large-scale datasets to accelerate property prediction, discovery, and design. However, prevailing approaches often treat data as a neutral substrate for modeling, obscuring the value-laden processes through which data is generated. Measurement choices—what properties to quantify, which materials to prioritize, and which experimental or computational protocols to employ—are inherently shaped by epistemic commitments, practical constraints, and broader societal priorities. These choices embed values into data infrastructures, systematically influencing which material phenomena become visible and which remain obscured in downstream models. This manuscript advances a conceptual framework that interprets measurement choices as value-mediated interfaces linking scientific priorities to data constitution and modeling feedback in materials informatics. The framework elucidates how value horizons, choice architectures, data formation processes, and modeling circuits interact to produce steering logics, trade-offs, and path-dependent dynamics. By reframing data bias as a constitutive outcome of value-conditioned measurement rather than a purely technical artifact, the framework reveals characteristic failure modes—including value lock-in, patterned absences, and self-reinforcing feedback—that constrain epistemic exploration. Integrating insights from materials informatics, data bias studies, and philosophical analyses of scientific practice, the framework provides a diagnostic lens for understanding the non-neutrality of data in iterative AI-driven workflows. Rather than prescribing methodological interventions, it foregrounds the epistemic consequences of measurement decisions, inviting greater reflexivity in shaping data landscapes over time. This perspective repositions materials informatics as an evolving epistemic system whose possibilities and limits are co-produced by values, measurements, and models.
UR - https://iamrp.net/c056158743
ER -