iamrp.net-bKCW-1791491020-d076514646 1791491020 Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press info@iamrp.net Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press Journal of Computational and Data-Driven Materials Engineering J. Comput. Data-Driven Mater. Eng. 3149-9368 2024 3 1 Yousef Al-Qahtani Fahad Al-Salem Abdullah Al-Harbi 2024 10.68159/d076514646 https://iamrp.net/pub/journal/2/article/d076514646 Lombardi D, Shipley TF, Astronomy Team, Biology Team, Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, et al. The curious construct of active learning. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2021;22(1):8-43. 10.1177/1529100620973974 Kumar P, Gupta A. Active learning query strategies for classification, regression, and clustering: A survey. J Comput Sci Technol. 2020;35(4):913-45. 10.1007/s11390-020-9487-4 Doolittle P, Wojdak K, Walters A. Defining active learning: A restricted systematic review. Teach Learn Inq. 2023;11:25. 10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.25 Liu Y, Wang H, Guo L, Yan Z, Zheng J, Zhou W, et al. Deep learning inter-atomic potential for irradiation damage in 3C-SiC. Comput Mater Sci. 2024;233:112693. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112693 Rahman MH, Biswas M, Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A. Understanding defect-mediated ion migration in semiconductors using atomistic simulations and machine learning. ACS Mater Au. 2024;4(6):557-73. 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00095 Zhang L, Han J, Wang H, Car R, E W. Deep potential molecular dynamics: A scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;120(14):143001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.143001 Batzner S, Musaelian A, Sun L, Geiger M, Mailoa JP, Kornbluth M, et al. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2453. 10.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 Lookman T, Balachandran PV, Xue D, Yuan R. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design. Npj Comput Mater. 2019;5(1):21. 10.1038/s41524-019-0153-8 Kusne AG, Yu H, Wu C, Zhang H, Hattrick-Simpers J, DeCost B, et al. On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5966. 10.1038/s41467-020-19597-w Nguyen VL, Shaker MH, Hüllermeier E. How to measure uncertainty in uncertainty sampling for active learning. Mach Learn. 2022;111(1):89-122. 10.1007/s10994-021-06003-9 Konyushkova K, Sznitman R, Fua P. Learning active learning from data. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30; 2017 Dec 4-9; Long Beach, CA, USA; 2017. p. 4228-38. 10.5555/3294996.3295177 Zhang L, Lin DY, Wang H, Car R, E W. Active learning of uniformly accurate interatomic potentials for materials simulation. Phys Rev Mater. 2019;3(2):023804. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.023804 Kaur H, Pannu HS, Malhi AK. A systematic review on imbalanced data challenges in machine learning: Applications and solutions. ACM Comput Surv. 2019;52(4):79. 10.1145/3343440 Nie S, Xiang Y, Wu L, Lin G, Liu Q, Chu S, et al. Active learning guided discovery of high entropy oxides featuring high H2-production. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146(43):29325-34. 10.1021/jacs.4c06272 Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A, Xiang X, Jacoby L, Biegaj R, Dunham ST, Gamelin DR, et al. Universal machine learning framework for defect predictions in zinc blende semiconductors. Patterns (N Y). 2022;3(3):100450. 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100450 Dral PO. Quantum chemistry in the age of machine learning. J Phys Chem Lett. 2020;11(6):2336-47. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03664 Bartók AP, De S, Poelking C, Bernstein N, Kermode JR, Csányi G, et al. Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules. Sci Adv. 2017;3(12):e1701816. 10.1126/sciadv.1701816 Arrigoni M, Madsen GK. Evolutionary computing and machine learning for discovering of low-energy defect configurations. Npj Comput Mater. 2021;7(1):71. 10.1038/s41524-021-00537-1 Sharma M, Bilgic M. Evidence-based uncertainty sampling for active learning. Data Min Knowl Discov. 2017;31(1):164-202. 10.1007/s10618-016-0460-3 Pandi A, Diehl C, Yazdizadeh Kharrazi A, Scholz SA, Bobkova E, Faure L, et al. A versatile active learning workflow for optimization of genetic and metabolic networks. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3876. 10.1038/s41467-022-31245-z Morawietz T, Artrith N. Machine learning-accelerated quantum mechanics-based atomistic simulations for industrial applications. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2021;35(4):557-86. 10.1007/s10822-020-00346-6 Koizumi A, Deffrennes G, Terayama K, Tamura R. Performance of uncertainty-based active learning for efficient approximation of black-box functions in materials science. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):27019. 10.1038/s41598-024-76800-4 Elreedy D, Atiya AF, Shaheen SI. A novel active learning regression framework for balancing the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Entropy (Basel). 2019;21(7):651. 10.3390/e21070651 Lew T, Sharma A, Harrison J, Bylard A, Pavone M. Safe active dynamics learning and control: A sequential exploration–exploitation framework. IEEE Trans Robot. 2022;38(5):2888-907. 10.1109/TRO.2022.3154715 Li L, Chang J, Vakanski A, Wang Y, Yao T, Xian M. Uncertainty quantification in multivariable regression for material property prediction with Bayesian neural networks. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):10543. 10.1038/s41598-024-61189-x Lv X, Duan F, Jiang JJ, Fu X, Gan L. Deep active learning for surface defect detection. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(6):1650. 10.3390/s20061650 Hong C, Kim J, Kim J, Jung J, Ju S, Choi JM, et al. Applications and training sets of machine learning potentials. Sci Technol Adv Mater Methods. 2023;3(1):2269948. 10.1080/27660400.2023.2269948 Karandikar J, Chaudhuri A, Smith S, Schmitz T, Willcox K. Process window estimation in manufacturing through Entropy-Sigma active learning. Manuf Lett. 2022;34:87-92. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.09.001 Hino H, Eguchi S. Active learning by query by committee with robust divergences. Inf Geom. 2023;6(1):81-106. 10.1007/s41884-022-00081-x