iamrp.net-nWlt-1791491023-k221799791 1791491023 Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press info@iamrp.net Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press Journal of Computational and Data-Driven Materials Engineering J. Comput. Data-Driven Mater. Eng. 3149-9368 2023 2 2 Andreas Müller Stefan Weber Julia Hoffmann Lukas Schneider Tobias Klein 2023 10.68159/k221799791 https://iamrp.net/pub/journal/2/article/k221799791 Bartók AP, De S, Poelking C, Bernstein N, Kermode JR, Csányi G, et al. Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules. Sci Adv. 2017;3(12):e1701816. 10.1126/sciadv.1701816 Zhang L, Han J, Wang H, Car R, E W. Deep potential molecular dynamics: A scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;120(14):143001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.143001 Batzner S, Musaelian A, Sun L, Geiger M, Mailoa JP, Kornbluth M, et al. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2453. 10.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 Weinreich J, Lemm D, von Rudorff GF, von Lilienfeld OA. Ab initio machine learning of phase space averages. J Chem Phys. 2022;157(2):024303. 10.1063/5.0095674 Behler J. Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials. Chem Rev. 2021;121(16):10037-72. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00868 Vita JA, Schwalbe-Koda D. Data efficiency and extrapolation trends in neural network interatomic potentials. Mach Learn Sci Technol. 2023;4(3):035031. 10.1088/2632-2153/acf115 Zeni C, Anelli A, Glielmo A, Rossi K. Exploring the robust extrapolation of high-dimensional machine learning potentials. Phys Rev B. 2022;105(16):165141. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.165141 Midgley SD, Hamad S, Butler KT, Grau-Crespo R. Bandgap engineering in the configurational space of solid solutions via machine learning: (Mg,Zn)O case study. J Phys Chem Lett. 2021;12(21):5163-8. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01031 Birschitzky VC, Ellinger F, Diebold U, Reticcioli M, Franchini C. Machine learning for exploring small polaron configurational space. NPJ Comput Mater. 2022;8(1):125. 10.1038/s41524-022-00805-8 Marchant GA, Caro MA, Karasulu B, Pártay LB. Exploring the configuration space of elemental carbon with empirical and machine learned interatomic potentials. NPJ Comput Mater. 2023;9(1):131. 10.1038/s41524-023-01081-w Zhu A, Batzner S, Musaelian A, Kozinsky B. Fast uncertainty estimates in deep learning interatomic potentials. J Chem Phys. 2023;158(16):164111. 10.1063/5.0136574 Hu Y, Musielewicz J, Ulissi ZW, Medford AJ. Robust and scalable uncertainty estimation with conformal prediction for machine-learned interatomic potentials. Mach Learn Sci Technol. 2022;3(4):045028. 10.1088/2632-2153/aca7b1 Thomas-Mitchell A, Hawe G, Popelier PL. Calibration of uncertainty in the active learning of machine learning force fields. Mach Learn Sci Technol. 2023;4(4):045034. 10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab5 Briganti V, Lunghi A. Efficient generation of stable linear machine-learning force fields with uncertainty-aware active learning. Mach Learn Sci Technol. 2023;4(3):035005. 10.1088/2632-2153/ace418 Torres A, Pedroza LS, Fernandez-Serra M, Rocha AR. Using neural network force fields to ascertain the quality of ab initio simulations of liquid water. J Phys Chem B. 2021;125(38):10772-8. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c04372 Gomes-Filho MS, Torres A, Rocha AR, Pedroza LS. Size and quality of quantum mechanical data set for training neural network force fields for liquid water. J Phys Chem B. 2023;127(6):1422-8. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c09059 Deringer VL, Bartók AP, Bernstein N, Wilkins DM, Ceriotti M, Csányi G. Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules. Chem Rev. 2021;121(16):10073-141. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00022 Poltavsky I, Tkatchenko A. Machine learning force fields: Recent advances and remaining challenges. J Phys Chem Lett. 2021;12(28):6551-64. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01204 Unke OT, Chmiela S, Sauceda HE, Gastegger M, Poltavsky I, Schütt KT, et al. Machine learning force fields. Chem Rev. 2021;121(16):10142-86. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01111 Yoo D, Jung J, Jeong W, Han S. Metadynamics sampling in atomic environment space for collecting training data for machine learning potentials. NPJ Comput Mater. 2021;7(1):131. 10.1038/s41524-021-00595-5 Lin Q, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Jiang B. Searching configurations in uncertainty space: Active learning of high-dimensional neural network reactive potentials. J Chem Theory Comput. 2021;17(5):2691-701. 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00166 Wang P, Shao Y, Wang H, Yang W. Accurate interatomic force field for molecular dynamics simulation by hybridizing classical and machine learning potentials. Extreme Mech Lett. 2018;24:1-5. 10.1016/j.eml.2018.08.002 Zhai Y, Caruso A, Gao S, Paesani F. Active learning of many-body configuration space: Application to the Cs+–water MB-nrg potential energy function as a case study. J Chem Phys. 2020;152(14):144103. 10.1063/5.0002162 Manna S, Loeffler TD, Batra R, Banik S, Chan H, Varughese B, et al. Learning in continuous action space for developing high dimensional potential energy models. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):368. 10.1038/s41467-021-27849-6 Deringer VL, Caro MA, Csányi G. Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science. Adv Mater. 2019;31(46):1902765. 10.1002/adma.201902765 Anstine DM, Isayev O. Machine learning interatomic potentials and long-range physics. J Phys Chem A. 2023;127(11):2417-31. 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c06778 Herzog B, Casier B, Lebègue S, Rocca D. Solving the Schrödinger equation in the configuration space with generative machine learning. J Chem Theory Comput. 2023;19(9):2484-90. 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01216 Langer MF, Goeßmann A, Rupp M. Representations of molecules and materials for interpolation of quantum-mechanical simulations via machine learning. NPJ Comput Mater. 2022;8(1):41. 10.1038/s41524-022-00721-x Shuaibi M, Sivakumar S, Chen RQ, Ulissi ZW. Enabling robust offline active learning for machine learning potentials using simple physics-based priors. Mach Learn Sci Technol. 2021;2(2):025007. 10.1088/2632-2153/abcc44