<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><doi_batch version="4.3.7" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.7" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.7 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref4.3.7.xsd">
		<head>
		<doi_batch_id>iamrp.net-K6PG-1793857851-n899925668</doi_batch_id>
		<timestamp>1793857851</timestamp>
		<depositor>
			<depositor_name>Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press</depositor_name>
			<email_address>info@iamrp.net</email_address>
		</depositor>
		<registrant>Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press</registrant>
	</head>
	<body>
		<journal>
			<journal_metadata>
				<full_title>Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Materials Science</full_title>
				<abbrev_title>J. Artif. Intell. Mater. Sci.</abbrev_title>
				<issn>3149-8957</issn>
			</journal_metadata>
			<journal_issue>
				<publication_date>
					<year>2025</year>
				</publication_date>
				<journal_volume>
					<volume>4</volume>
				</journal_volume>
				<issue>2</issue>
			</journal_issue>
			<journal_article publication_type="full_text">
				<titles>
					<title>Conceptual Foundations for Scientific Contestability in AI-Driven Materials Decisions</title>
				</titles>
								<contributors>
          					<person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Mohammed</given_name>
            <surname>Al-Farsi</surname>
					</person_name>
          					<person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Salim</given_name>
            <surname>Al-Harthy</surname>
					</person_name>
          					<person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Nasser</given_name>
            <surname>Al-Rawahi</surname>
					</person_name>
          				</contributors>
								<publication_date>
					<year>2025</year>
				</publication_date>
				<doi_data>
					<doi>10.68159/n899925668</doi>
					<resource>https://iamrp.net/pub/journal/1/article/n899925668</resource>
				</doi_data>
				<citation_list>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-ef9d7cbe-12af-4b33-9a31-94e5fa6e7482">
					  <unstructured_citation>Leofante F, Ayoobi H, Dejl A, Freedman G, Gorur D, Jiang J, et al. Contestable AI needs computational argumentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10729. 2024 May 17.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-aaa1eddb-3c3f-47f4-993a-fab0433898fe">
					  <unstructured_citation>Binns R. Algorithmic accountability and public reason. Philos Technol. 2018;31(4):543-56.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-c62a8596-5854-4842-8b32-379b0cae1f42">
					  <unstructured_citation>Yonathan M. Mathematical foundations for machine learning: A programming-enhanced educational framework for undergraduate education. Available from: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=5367023</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-6dd0d2ed-15ef-4bf7-941d-55d0b52644c6">
					  <unstructured_citation>Butler KT, Davies DW, Cartwright H, Isayev O, Walsh A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature. 2018;559(7715):547-55.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-938bdac2-96b0-4263-8453-c06bd43e4b53">
					  <unstructured_citation>Schmidt J, Marques MR, Botti S, Marques MA. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj Comput Mater. 2019;5(1):83.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-b2cf6cc8-2640-421f-b4a6-57581bec919e">
					  <unstructured_citation>Zunger A. Inverse design in search of materials with target functionalities. Nat Rev Chem. 2018;2(4):0121.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-1ff2daf4-6503-4ee8-9624-c87ba9194b3f">
					  <unstructured_citation>Montoya JH, Aykol M, Anapolsky A, Gopal CB, Herring PK, Hummelshøj JS, et al. Toward autonomous materials research: Recent progress and future challenges. Appl Phys Rev. 2022;9(1).</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-2a9d4398-587b-4531-80f5-6e7da689f72c">
					  <unstructured_citation>Vaccaro K, Karahalios K, Mulligan DK, Kluttz D, Hirsch T. Contestability in algorithmic systems. In: Companion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing; 2019. p. 523-7.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-504f5101-e032-4a16-90af-bd69d493e5b7">
					  <unstructured_citation>Tretter M. Opportunities and challenges of AI-systems in political decision-making contexts. Front Polit Sci. 2025;7:1504520.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-f381c9b5-d20f-4481-93bc-52c364e4cedb">
					  <unstructured_citation>Burgun A, Do V, Elamrani A, Kirat T, Lang J, Poibeau T. Challenges in AI-assisted decision-making: Insights from the medical and the legal domains. 2025.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-f62833e1-04dd-4ede-99b6-e374c3f5476b">
					  <unstructured_citation>Board DI. AI principles: Recommendations on the ethical use of artificial intelligence by the department of defense: Supporting document. United States Department of Defense. 2019.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-fc4be389-c41a-4708-b8d6-3c0a4646a306">
					  <unstructured_citation>Schnitzer M, Montag F. Preserving contest ability in the data economy. Compet Law Policy Debate. 2019;5(2):55-65.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-be968654-7556-4597-bfbe-c995bcded0e9">
					  <unstructured_citation>McInerney T. The algorithmic construction of epistemic injustice. In: Socio-legal studies on epistemic injustice and spaces and places. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2026. p. 123-54.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-03d2527b-ffe0-4fe1-b77c-520f3f3288d7">
					  <unstructured_citation>Suksi M. Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: Some notes from a Finnish perspective. Artif Intell Law. 2021;29(1):87-110.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-2b026ea0-e4d2-4b76-996a-3dfa35d0eab2">
					  <unstructured_citation>Orphanou K, Otterbacher J, Kleanthous S, Batsuren K, Giunchiglia F, Bogina V, et al. Mitigating bias in algorithmic systems—a fish-eye view. ACM Comput Surv. 2022;55(5):1-37.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-d1ecf941-3f7c-4b75-9e60-7ad5428aafc3">
					  <unstructured_citation>Cruz-Aguilar MA. The epistemic revolution of AI: Reconfiguring the foundations of scientific knowledge. AI Soc. 2025:1-7.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-b5aec0bd-5e04-41ed-b9e3-009d083743a5">
					  <unstructured_citation>Chen SS. The dawn of AI generated contents: Revisiting compulsory mediation and IP disputes resolution. Contemp Asia Arb J. 2023;16:301.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-b880135f-026f-4aef-ab53-99e80adb1337">
					  <unstructured_citation>Moreira C, Palatkina A, Braca D, Walsh DM, Leihn PJ, Chen F, et al. Explainable AI systems must be contestable: Here’s how to make it happen. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01662. 2025 Jun 2.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-872a110c-28db-4415-b9aa-3d2075481cc8">
					  <unstructured_citation>Dignum V, Michael L, Nieves JC, Slavkovik M, Suarez J, Theodorou A. Contesting black-box AI decisions. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS); 2025. p. 2854-8.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-7bd8b2de-bd00-42b3-8dee-4a0b9a73eb4d">
					  <unstructured_citation>Lyons H, Velloso E, Miller T. Conceptualising contestability: Perspectives on contesting algorithmic decisions. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2021;5(CSCW1):1-25.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-676f93ad-cbaa-4ff4-8b90-a4c8a0508ea5">
					  <unstructured_citation>Mukherjee A, Chang HH. Agentic AI: Autonomy, accountability, and the algorithmic society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00289. 2025 Feb 1.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-e50131b1-8f26-4667-b1a2-6f4fd7d91996">
					  <unstructured_citation>Liedong TA. The liability of tribe in corporate political activity: Ethical implications for political contestability. J Bus Ethics. 2022;181(3):623-44.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-91c43fc1-fe06-4f64-916b-0abcb80865b9">
					  <unstructured_citation>Reeves-McLaren N, Christensen SM. Data integrity in materials science in the era of AI: Balancing accelerated discovery with responsible science and innovation. J Mater Chem A. 2026;14(1):276-83.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-d216037c-b5ad-444a-89db-e88b29c5112f">
					  <unstructured_citation>Cath C, Wachter S, Mittelstadt B, Taddeo M, Floridi L. Artificial intelligence and the good society: The US, EU, and UK approach. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(2):505-28.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-c20f4b4b-ca2e-4ac3-9fb4-1d8959b248d7">
					  <unstructured_citation>Pohlhaus Jr G. Knowing without borders and the work of epistemic gathering. In: Decolonizing feminism: Transnational feminism and globalization; 2017. p. 37-54.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-df4604b3-c145-4a55-922e-824bdb8b3cfd">
					  <unstructured_citation>Landau S, Dempsey JX, Kamar E, Bellovin SM, Pool R. Challenging the machine: Contestability in government AI systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10430. 2024 Jun 14.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-f3e04c38-6b99-4637-b473-77dd8d3551a0">
					  <unstructured_citation>Alfrink K, Keller I, Kortuem G, Doorn N. Contestable AI by design: Towards a framework. Minds Mach. 2023;33(4):613-39.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-febcbd2a-0d84-4707-97a6-0f18cd2e0342">
					  <unstructured_citation>Singh AV, Rosenkranz D, Ansari MH, Singh R, Kanase A, Singh SP, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning empower advanced biomedical material design to toxicity prediction. Adv Intell Syst. 2020;2(12):2000084.</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          					<citation key="rk-10.68159/n899925668-af2287d5-b08d-4e92-aaea-2e2235874dc5">
					  <unstructured_citation>Delacroix S. Diachronic interpretability and machine learning systems. J Cross Discip Res Comput Law. 2022;1(2).</unstructured_citation>
											</citation>
          				</citation_list>
			</journal_article>
		</journal>
	</body>
</doi_batch>
