iamrp.net-6anA-1791491022-q586284494 1791491022 Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press info@iamrp.net Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press Journal of Computational and Data-Driven Materials Engineering J. Comput. Data-Driven Mater. Eng. 3149-9368 2025 4 2 Anna Svensson Erik Lindberg 2025 10.68159/q586284494 https://iamrp.net/pub/journal/2/article/q586284494 Fare C, Fenner P, Benatan M, Varsi A, Pyzer-Knapp EO. A multi-fidelity machine learning approach to high throughput materials screening. npj Comput Mater. 2022;8(1):257. 10.1038/s41524-022-00947-9 Buterez D, Janet JP, Kiddle SJ, Liò P. MF-PCBA: Multifidelity high-throughput screening benchmarks for drug discovery and machine learning. J Chem Inf Model. 2023;63(9):2667-78. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01569 Bash D, Cai Y, Chellappan V, Wong SL, Yang X, Kumar P, et al. Multi-fidelity high-throughput optimization of electrical conductivity in P3HT-CNT composites. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(36):2102606. 10.1002/adfm.202102606 Ren P, Xiao Y, Chang X, Huang PY, Li Z, Gupta BB, et al. A survey of deep active learning. ACM Comput Surv. 2021;54(9):1-40. 10.1145/3472291 Rezapourian M, Darabi AC, Khoshbin M, Schmauder S, Hussainova I. Surrogate-model prediction of mechanical response in architected Ti6Al4V cylindrical TPMS metamaterials. Metals. 2025;15(12):1372. 10.3390/met15121372 Duan C, Liu F, Nandy A, Kulik HJ. Data-driven approaches can overcome the cost-accuracy trade-off in multireference diagnostics. J Chem Theory Comput. 2020;16(7):4373-87. 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00358 Chen C, Zuo Y, Ye W, Li X, Ong SP. Learning properties of ordered and disordered materials from multi-fidelity data. Nat Comput Sci. 2021;1(1):46-53. 10.1038/s43588-020-00002-x Tran A, Tranchida J, Wildey T, Thompson AP. Multi-fidelity machine-learning with uncertainty quantification and Bayesian optimization for materials design: Application to ternary random alloys. J Chem Phys. 2020;153(7):074705. 10.1063/5.0015672 Messerly M, Matin S, Allen AEA, Nebgen B, Barros K, Smith JS, et al. Multi-fidelity learning for interatomic potentials: Low-level forces and high-level energies are all you need. Mach Learn Sci Technol. 2025;6(3):035066. 10.1088/2632-2153/ae040b Gantzler N, Deshwal A, Doppa JR, Simon CM. Multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization of covalent organic frameworks for xenon/krypton separations. Digit Discov. 2023;2(6):1937-56. 10.1039/D3DD00117B Choudhary K, Garrity KF, Sharma V, Biacchi AJ, Hight Walker AR, Tavazza F. High-throughput density functional perturbation theory and machine learning predictions of infrared, piezoelectric, and dielectric responses. npj Comput Mater. 2020;6(1):64. 10.1038/s41524-020-0337-2 Buterez D, Janet JP, Kiddle SJ, Oglic D, Liò P. Transfer learning with graph neural networks for improved molecular property prediction in the multi-fidelity setting. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):1517. 10.1038/s41467-024-45566-8 Woo HM, Qian X, Tan L, Jha S, Alexander FJ, Dougherty ER, et al. Optimal decision-making in high-throughput virtual screening pipelines. Patterns (N Y). 2023;4(11):100875. 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100875 Hajiali F, Ellis N, Gopaluni B. From biomass waste to CO2 capture: A multi-fidelity machine learning workflow for high-throughput screening of activated carbons. npj Comput Mater. 2025;11(1):363. 10.1038/s41524-025-01786-0 Jeong J, Kim J, Sun J, Min K. Machine-learning-driven high-throughput screening for high-energy density and stable NASICON cathodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(19):24431-41. 10.1021/acsami.3c18448 Woo HM, Allam O, Chen J, Jang SS, Yoon BJ. Optimal high-throughput virtual screening pipeline for efficient selection of redox-active organic materials. iScience. 2023;26(1):105735. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105735 Kim J, Li M, Li Y, Gómez A, Hinder O, Leu PW. Multi-BOWS: Multi-fidelity multi-objective Bayesian optimization with warm starts for nanophotonic structure design. Digit Discov. 2024;3(2):381-91. 10.1039/D3DD00177F Madin OC, Shirts MR. Using physical property surrogate models to perform accelerated multi-fidelity optimization of force field parameters. Digit Discov. 2023;2(3):828-47. 10.1039/D2DD00138A Wang Z, Liu X, Chen H, Yang T, He Y. Exploring multi-fidelity data in materials science: Challenges, applications, and optimized learning strategies. Appl Sci. 2023;13(24):13176. 10.3390/app132413176 Samadian D, Muhit IB, Dawood N. Application of data-driven surrogate models in structural engineering: A literature review. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2025;32(2):735-84. 10.1007/s11831-024-10152-0 Duan C, Chu DB, Nandy A, Kulik HJ. Detection of multi-reference character imbalances enables a transfer learning approach for virtual high throughput screening with coupled cluster accuracy at DFT cost. Chem Sci. 2022;13(17):4962-71. 10.1039/D2SC00393G Howard AA, Perego M, Karniadakis GE, Stinis P. Multifidelity deep operator networks for data-driven and physics-informed problems. J Comput Phys. 2023;493:112462. 10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112462 Uthayakumar H, K RK, Jain R, Kumar R, Patra TK. QRChEM: A deep learning framework for materials property prediction and design using QR codes. ACS Eng Au. 2024;4(1):91-8. 10.1021/acsengineeringau.3c00055 Sabanza-Gil V, Barbano R, Pacheco Gutiérrez D, Luterbacher JS, Hernández-Lobato JM, Schwaller P, et al. Best practices for multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization in materials and molecular research. Nat Comput Sci. 2025;5(7):572-81. 10.1038/s43588-025-00822-9 Cho EH, Lyu Q, Lin LC. Computational discovery of nanoporous materials for energy- and environment-related applications. Mol Simul. 2019;45(14-15):1122-47. 10.1080/08927022.2019.1626990 Menon N, Mondal S, Basak A. Multi-fidelity surrogate-based process mapping with uncertainty quantification in laser directed energy deposition. Materials. 2022;15(8):2902. 10.3390/ma15082902 Nguyen BD, Potapenko P, Demirci A, Govind K, Bompas S, Sandfeld S. Efficient surrogate models for materials science simulations: Machine learning-based prediction of microstructure properties. Mach Learn Appl. 2024;16:100544. 10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100544 Minotakis M, Rossignol H, Cobelli M, Sanvito S. Machine-learning surrogate model for accelerating the search of stable ternary alloys. Phys Rev Mater. 2023;7(9):093802. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.093802 Wang T, Shao M, Guo R, Tao F, Zhang G, Snoussi H, et al. Surrogate model via artificial intelligence method for accelerating screening materials and performance prediction. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(8):2006245. 10.1002/adfm.202006245 Shah AA, Leung PK, Xing WW. Rapid high-fidelity quantum simulations using multi-step nonlinear autoregression and graph embeddings. npj Comput Mater. 2025;11(1):57. 10.1038/s41524-024-01479-0 Krawczuk S. Data-efficient surrogate models for high-throughput density functional theory [master’s thesis]. Santa Cruz (CA): University of California, Santa Cruz. Mayr F, Gagliardi A. Global property prediction: A benchmark study on open-source, perovskite-like datasets. ACS Omega. 2021;6(19):12722-32. 10.1021/acsomega.1c00991 Palizhati A, Aykol M, Suram SK, Hummelshøj JS, Montoya JH. Multi-fidelity sequential learning for accelerated materials discovery. ChemRxiv [Preprint]. 2021. 10.26434/chemrxiv.14312612.v1