iamrp.net-kdoy-1791491021-r230853048 1791491021 Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press info@iamrp.net Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press Journal of Computational and Data-Driven Materials Engineering J. Comput. Data-Driven Mater. Eng. 3149-9368 2024 3 2 Peter Novak Jana Svoboda 2024 10.68159/r230853048 https://iamrp.net/pub/journal/2/article/r230853048 Batzner S, Musaelian A, Sun L, Geiger M, Mailoa JP, Kornbluth M, et al. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2453. 10.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 Bartók AP, De S, Poelking C, Bernstein N, Kermode JR, Csányi G, et al. Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules. Sci Adv. 2017;3(12):e1701816. 10.1126/sciadv.1701816 Zhang L, Han J, Wang H, Car R, E W. Deep potential molecular dynamics: A scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;120(14):143001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.143001 Zuo Y, Chen C, Li X, Deng Z, Chen Y, Behler J, et al. Performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials. J Phys Chem A. 2020;124(4):731-45. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 Chan H, Narayanan B, Cherukara MJ, Sen FG, Sasikumar K, Gray SK, et al. Machine learning classical interatomic potentials for molecular dynamics from first-principles training data. J Phys Chem C. 2019;123(12):6941-57. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09917 Deringer VL, Bartók AP, Bernstein N, Wilkins DM, Ceriotti M, Csányi G. Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules. Chem Rev. 2021;121(16):10073-141. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00022 Wang G, Wang C, Zhang X, Li Z, Zhou J, Sun Z. Machine learning interatomic potential: Bridge the gap between small-scale models and realistic device-scale simulations. iScience. 2024;27(5):109673. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109673 Anstine DM, Isayev O. Machine learning interatomic potentials and long-range physics. J Phys Chem A. 2023;127(11):2417-31. 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c06778 Novikov IS, Shapeev AV. Improving accuracy of interatomic potentials: More physics or more data? A case study of silica. Mater Today Commun. 2019;18:74-80. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.11.008 Rowe P, Csányi G, Alfè D, Michaelides A. Development of a machine learning potential for graphene. Phys Rev B. 2018;97(5):054303. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.054303 Gubler M, Finkler JA, Schäfer MR, Behler J, Goedecker S. Accelerating fourth-generation machine learning potentials using quasi-linear scaling particle mesh charge equilibration. J Chem Theory Comput. 2024;20(16):7264-71. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00334 Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A, Talwalkar A. Foundations of machine learning. 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2018. 504 p. Ko TW, Finkler JA, Goedecker S, Behler J. General-purpose machine learning potentials capturing nonlocal charge transfer. Acc Chem Res. 2021;54(4):808-17. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00689 Eckhoff M, Reiher M. Lifelong machine learning potentials. J Chem Theory Comput. 2023;19(12):3509-25. 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00279 Moriel A, Richard D, Lerner E, Bouchbinder E. Elementary processes in dilatational plasticity of glasses. Phys Rev Res. 2024;6(2):023167. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023167 Kim K, Dive A, Grieder A, Adelstein N, Kang S, Wan LF, et al. Flexible machine-learning interatomic potential for simulating structural disordering behavior of Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. J Chem Phys. 2022;156(22):221101. 10.1063/5.0090341 Goedecker SA, Tahmasbi H, Khajehpasha ER, Rostami S, Asnaashari H, Faraji S, et al. Structure prediction of ionic materials using the Minima Hopping method and the CENT machine learning potential. In: APS March Meeting 2021; 2021 Mar 15-19; Virtual. College Park (MD): American Physical Society; 2021. Abstract M41.00008. Pan Y. Predictive modeling of ionic conductivity in solid polymer electrolytes [master’s thesis]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington; 2024. Mortazavi B, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T, Shapeev AV. Atomistic modeling of the mechanical properties: The rise of machine learning interatomic potentials. Mater Horiz. 2023;10(6):1956-68. 10.1039/d3mh00125c Bjørheim TS, Hoedl MF, Merkle R, Kotomin EA, Maier J. Proton, hydroxide ion, and oxide ion affinities of closed-shell oxides: Importance for the hydration reaction and correlation to electronic structure. J Phys Chem C. 2020;124(2):1277-84. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07570 Alpaydin E. Machine learning. Rev updated ed. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2021. 280 p. Zinovjev K. Electrostatic embedding of machine learning potentials. J Chem Theory Comput. 2023;19(6):1888-97. 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00914 Staacke CG, Wengert S, Kunkel C, Csányi G, Reuter K, Margraf JT. Kernel charge equilibration: Efficient and accurate prediction of molecular dipole moments with a machine-learning enhanced electron density model. Mach Learn Sci Technol. 2022;3(1):015032. 10.1088/2632-2153/ac568d Ongari D, Boyd PG, Kadioglu O, Mace AK, Keskin S, Smit B. Evaluating charge equilibration methods to generate electrostatic fields in nanoporous materials. J Chem Theory Comput. 2019;15(1):382-401. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00669 Khajehpasha ER, Finkler JA, Kühne TD, Ghasemi SA. CENT2: Improved charge equilibration via neural network technique. Phys Rev B. 2022;105(14):144106. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.144106 Friederich P, Häse F, Proppe J, Aspuru-Guzik A. Machine-learned potentials for next-generation matter simulations. Nat Mater. 2021;20(6):750-61. 10.1038/s41563-020-0777-6 Zhou ZH. Machine learning. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2021. 10.1007/978-981-15-1967-3