iamrp.net-57bZ-1793674452-t344659359 1793674452 Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press info@iamrp.net Institute for Advanced Materials Research Press Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Materials Science J. Artif. Intell. Mater. Sci. 3149-8957 2024 3 1 Ahmed Mansour Omar Saeed Lina Hassan 2024 10.68159/t344659359 https://iamrp.net/pub/journal/1/article/t344659359 Himanen L, Jäger MOJ, Morooka EV, Federici Canova F, Ranawat YS, Gao DZ, et al. DScribe: library of descriptors for machine learning in materials science. Comput Phys Commun. 2020;247:106949. Laakso J, Himanen L, Pouillon Y, Jäger MOJ, Foster AS. Updates to the DScribe library: new descriptors and derivatives. J Chem Phys. 2023;158(23):234802. Schmidt J, Marques MRG, Botti S, Marques MAL. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj Comput Mater. 2020;6:83. Butler KT, Davies DW, Cartwright H, Isayev O, Walsh A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature. 2020;559:547–55. Wei J, Chu X, Sun X, Xu K, Deng H, Chen J, et al. Machine learning in materials science. InfoMat. 2020;2(3):338–58. Chen C, Zuo Y, Ye W, Li X, Ong SP. Graph networks as a universal machine learning framework for molecules and crystals. Chem Mater. 2020;32(2):309–18. Roscher R, Bohn B, Duarte MF, Garcke J. Explainable machine learning for scientific insights and discoveries. IEEE Access. 2020;8:42200–16. Belle V, Papantonis I. Principles and practice of explainable machine learning. Front Big Data. 2021;4:688969. Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H, DeGrave A, Prutkin JM, Nair B, et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat Mach Intell. 2020;2:56–67. Adebayo J, Gilmer J, Muelly M, Goodfellow I, Hardt M, Kim B. Sanity checks for saliency maps. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020;33:9505–15. Ghorbani A, Abid A, Zou J. Interpretation of neural networks is fragile. AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2021;35(7):5841–8. Slack D, Hilgard S, Jia E, Singh S, Lakkaraju H. Fooling LIME and SHAP: adversarial attacks on post hoc explanation methods. AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2021;35(14):11856–63. Schölkopf B, Locatello F, Bauer S, Ke N, Kalchbrenner N, Goyal A, et al. Toward causal representation learning. Proc IEEE. 2021;109(5):612–34. Karimi AH, Barthe G, Schölkopf B, Valera I. A survey of algorithmic recourse: Contrastive explanations and consequential recommendations. ACM Comput Surv. 2021;54(8):1–36. Mothilal RK, Sharma A, Tan C. Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations. Proc ACM FAT. 2020;607–17. Ovadia Y, Fertig E, Ren J, Nado Z, Sculley D, Nowozin S, et al. Can you trust your model’s uncertainty? Evaluating predictive uncertainty under dataset shift. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2021;34:13991–4005. Gilpin LH, Bau D, Yuan BZ, Bajwa A, Specter M, Kagal L. Explaining explanations: an overview of interpretability of machine learning. Proc IEEE. 2020;108(3):369–92. Lipton ZC. The mythos of model interpretability. Commun ACM. 2022;65(10):36–43. Samek W, Wiegand T, Müller KR. Explainable artificial intelligence: understanding, visualizing and interpreting deep learning models. ITU J ICT Discov. 2021;1(1):39–48. Covert I, Lundberg S, Lee SI. Explaining by removing: a unified framework for model explanation. J Mach Learn Res. 2021;22(209):1–90. Frye C, de Mijolla D, Cowton L, Stanley M, Feige I. Shapley explainability on the data manifold. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2021;34:17410–23. Guidotti R. Counterfactual explanations and how to find them: literature review and benchmarking. Inf Syst. 2022;101:101–11. Wachter S, Mittelstadt B, Russell C. Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: automated decisions and the GDPR. Harv J Law Technol. 2022;31(2):841–87. Glymour C, Zhang K, Spirtes P. Review of causal discovery methods based on graphical models. Front Genet. 2020;11:81. Mooij J, Janzing D, Schölkopf B. From ordinary differential equations to causal discovery. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5104. Runge J, Nowack P, Kretschmer M, Flaxman S, Sejdinovic D. Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets. Sci Adv. 2020;6(10):eaau4996. Imbens GW. Potential outcome and directed acyclic graph approaches to causality: relevance for empirical practice. J Econ Lit. 2020;58(4):1129–79. Yuan H, Yu H, Wang J, Li K, Ji S. Explainability in graph neural networks: a taxonomy and survey. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data. 2022;16(5):1–35. Pope PE, Kolouri S, Rostami M, Martin CE, Hoffmann H. Explainability methods for graph convolutional neural networks. Proc CVPR. 2020;10772–81. Zhang Y, Tiňo P, Leonardis A, Tang K. A survey on neural network interpretability. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput Intell. 2021;5(4):726–42. Koh PW, Liang P. Understanding black-box predictions via influence functions. Proc ICML. 2020;188–97. Jha D, Ward L, Paul A, Liao W, Choudhary A, Wolverton C, et al. ElemNet: deep learning the chemistry of materials from only elemental composition. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1477. Xie T, Grossman JC. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate prediction of material properties. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;120:145301.